In re Nemec

679 N.E.2d 685, 79 Ohio St. 3d 52
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 18, 1997·No. No. 97-412·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

We accept the findings and conclusions of the board, but believe that applicant should demonstrate his freedom from substance abuse for a longer period before being permitted to sit for the bar examination. We therefore order that applicant be permitted to reapply to take the July 1998 bar examination, to coincide with the approximate date of the conclusion of his two-year contract with OLAP.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Nemec, 679 N.E.2d 685, 79 Ohio St. 3d 52 (Ohio 1997).

679 N.E.2d 685 (In re Nemec) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Application of Kemp
1998 Ohio 550 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
In re Application of Nemec
1997 Ohio 406 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)