In re Nelson's will

70 Vt. 130
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided October 15, 1897·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Taft, J.

Any real estate which the appellant Lizzie may take as an heir of the testator will not be her separate estate, which involves as the characterizing fact, that she will hold it to her sole use in exclusion of the marital rights of her husband. Frary v. Booth, 37 Vt. 78; Hubbard v. Bugbee, 58 Vt. 172. And her husband, the appellant George H., will be entitled to the rents and profits of it during coverture. Hackett v. Moxley, 68 Vt. 210. He therefore properly joined in the appeal.

Judgment affirmed and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Nelson's will, 70 Vt. 130 (Vt. 1897).

70 Vt. 130 (In re Nelson's will) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fadden v. Fadden
103 A. 1020 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1918)
Ainger v. White's Admrx.
82 A. 666 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1912)
In re Hathaway's Will
53 A. 996 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1903)
Laird v. Perry
59 L.R.A. 340 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1902)
In re Marsh
109 F. 602 (D. Vermont, 1901)
In re Rooney
109 F. 601 (D. Vermont, 1901)
Sowles v. Harr
50 A. 550 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1901)