In re Nelson T.

Connecticut Appellate Court

In re Nelson T.

744 A.2d 441, 56 Conn. App. 482, 2000 Conn. App. LEXIS 35

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedJanuary 25, 2000

DocketAC 19586

StatusPublished

This text of 744 A.2d 441 (In re Nelson T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Nelson T., 744 A.2d 441, 56 Conn. App. 482, 2000 Conn. App. LEXIS 35 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from the judgments of the trial court terminating her parental rights with respect to her minor children,¹ the respondent mother claims that the trial court improperly found (1) that she failed to achieve sufficient rehabilitation pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 17a-112 (c) (3) (B) and (2) that termination was in the best interests of the children.

We have fully reviewed the records and briefs and considered the oral arguments of the parties. In her appeal, the respondent mother relies solely on fact bound issues. The trial court’s findings are supported by the evidence and the inferences that may reasonably be drawn therefrom. Having applied the appropriate standard of review; see In re Roshawn R., 51 Conn. App. 44, 51, 720 A.2d 1112 (1998); we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion and that its decision conforms to the applicable law.

The judgments are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from the judgments of the trial court terminating her parental rights with respect to her minor children,¹ the respondent mother claims that the trial court improperly found (1) that she failed to achieve sufficient rehabilitation pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 17a-112 (c) (3) (B) and (2) that termination was in the best interests of the children.

We have fully reviewed the records and briefs and considered the oral arguments of the parties. In her appeal, the respondent mother relies solely on fact bound issues. The trial court’s findings are supported by the evidence and the inferences that may reasonably be drawn therefrom. Having applied the appropriate standard of review; see In re Roshawn R., 51 Conn. App. 44, 51, 720 A.2d 1112 (1998); we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion and that its decision conforms to the applicable law.

The judgments are affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

744 A.2d 441, 56 Conn. App. 482, 2000 Conn. App. LEXIS 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nelson-t-connappct-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack