In re Nelson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Nelson

504 S.E.2d 317, 332 S.C. 88, 1998 S.C. LEXIS 115

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided August 13, 1998·Published

Opinion

ORDER

By order dated June 6, 1997, respondent was placed on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(a), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, because he had been indicted for a serious crime. Respondent has been acquitted of the charge for which he was indicted.

IT IS ORDERED that the interim suspension imposed on June 6,1997, is lifted.

/s/ Ernest A, Finney, Jr., C.J.

/s/ Jean H. Toal, J.

/s/ James E. Moore, J.

/a/ John H. Waller, Jr„ J.

/s/ E.C. Burnett, III, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

By order dated June 6, 1997, respondent was placed on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(a), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, because he had been indicted for a serious crime. Respondent has been acquitted of the charge for which he was indicted.

IT IS ORDERED that the interim suspension imposed on June 6,1997, is lifted.

/s/ Ernest A, Finney, Jr., C.J.

/s/ Jean H. Toal, J.

/s/ James E. Moore, J.

/a/ John H. Waller, Jr„ J.

/s/ E.C. Burnett, III, J.

In re Nelson, 504 S.E.2d 317, 332 S.C. 88, 1998 S.C. LEXIS 115 (S.C. 1998).

Pincite

504 S.E.2d 317 (In re Nelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.