In re Nelson

486 S.E.2d 97, 326 S.C. 262, 1997 S.C. LEXIS 113
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJune 6, 1997
StatusPublished

This text of 486 S.E.2d 97 (In re Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Nelson, 486 S.E.2d 97, 326 S.C. 262, 1997 S.C. LEXIS 113 (S.C. 1997).

Opinion

ORDER

Respondent has filed a petition for reinstatement, motion to dismiss, motion to quash and motion for ancillary relief. Disciplinary Counsel has filed returns in opposition to these motions and has requested that respondent be placed on interim suspension. We deny each of respondent’s motions and all other relief he has requested. We grant Disciplinary Counsel’s request to place respondent on interim suspension based on the fact that respondent has been indicted for a serious offense. Rules 2(z), 16 and 17(a), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Ernest A. Finney Jr., C.J.

/s/ Jean H. Toal, J.

/s/ James E. Moore, J.

/s/ John H, Waller Jr., J.

/s/ E.C. Burnett III, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
486 S.E.2d 97, 326 S.C. 262, 1997 S.C. LEXIS 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nelson-sc-1997.