In re Nelson R.
This text of 90 A.D.3d 415 (In re Nelson R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[416]*416The court properly denied appellant’s suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations. The officer’s testimony established a lawful seizure under the plain view doctrine, and we do not find that testimony to be implausible or unworthy of belief. Concur — Tom, J.E, Andrias, Catterson, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 A.D.3d 415, 933 N.Y.2d 552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nelson-r-nyappdiv-2011.