In Re: Neill
This text of In Re: Neill (In Re: Neill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE: RICHARD W. NEILL, STEPHANIE MITCHKO, PETER CARAMANICA, CSC HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellants ______________________
2015-1431 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. 12/055,795. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
ROBERT KELSEY KRY, MoloLamken LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellants. Also represented by JEFFREY A. LAMKEN; GERALD MEYER, Chicago, IL; PAULINE PELLETIER, ROBERT EVAN SOKOHL, JON WRIGHT, Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, Washington, DC.
BRIAN RACILLA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JEREMIAH HELM, LORE A. UNT. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (MOORE, MAYER, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 9, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Neill, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-neill-cafc-2016.