In Re Ned McDaniel

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

In Re Ned McDaniel

1919 OK CR 182, 180 P. 193, 16 Okla. Crim. 676, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 136

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 31, 1919

DocketNo. A-2339.

StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK CR 182 (In Re Ned McDaniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Ned McDaniel, 1919 OK CR 182, 180 P. 193, 16 Okla. Crim. 676, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 136 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

*677 PER CURIAM.

This was an application for the purpose of obtaining a writ of prohibition against the district court of Jackson county to prevent petitioner being tried on an information charging said petitioner with the crime of embezzlement, on the ground that said district court was without jurisdiction.

The information charged the embezzlement of $68.45, alleged to have been received by petitioner as fees while he was clerk of said district court.

On the day it was filed, a demurrer to the application was sustained, and the cause dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*677 PER CURIAM.

This was an application for the purpose of obtaining a writ of prohibition against the district court of Jackson county to prevent petitioner being tried on an information charging said petitioner with the crime of embezzlement, on the ground that said district court was without jurisdiction.

The information charged the embezzlement of $68.45, alleged to have been received by petitioner as fees while he was clerk of said district court.

On the day it was filed, a demurrer to the application was sustained, and the cause dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1919 OK CR 182, 180 P. 193, 16 Okla. Crim. 676, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ned-mcdaniel-oklacrimapp-1919.