In Re Nealy

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In Re Nealy

963 A.2d 817, 197 N.J. 431, 2009 N.J. LEXIS 24

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 27, 2009·No. D-70 September Term 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that WALTER D. NEALY, formerly of HACKEN-SACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, and who was suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months effective August 11, 2008, by Order of this Court filed June 14, 2008, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately, and it is further

ORDERED that WALTER D. NEALY shall practice under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years and until the further Order of the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that WALTER D. NEALY, formerly of HACKEN-SACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, and who was suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months effective August 11, 2008, by Order of this Court filed June 14, 2008, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately, and it is further

ORDERED that WALTER D. NEALY shall practice under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years and until the further Order of the Court.

In Re Nealy, 963 A.2d 817, 197 N.J. 431, 2009 N.J. LEXIS 24 (N.J. 2009).

Pincite

963 A.2d 817 (In Re Nealy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related