In re Neal

Supreme Court of Georgia

In re Neal

405 S.E.2d 875, 261 Ga. 265, 1991 Ga. LEXIS 247

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 23, 1991·No. Supreme Court Disciplinary No. 808·Published

Opinion

Per curiam.

Respondent Jerry N. Neal has petitioned for voluntary discipline. His petition is based upon his admissions of fact and conduct in violation of Standard 44 of State Bar Rule 4-102.

Respondent, in his petition, requests that this Court accept his request for voluntary discipline in the form of a Review Panel Reprimand.

Based upon the record and the recommendation of the Review Panel of the State Bar Disciplinary Board, it is directed that respondent receive a Review Panel reprimand.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

Respondent Jerry N. Neal has petitioned for voluntary discipline. His petition is based upon his admissions of fact and conduct in violation of Standard 44 of State Bar Rule 4-102.

Respondent, in his petition, requests that this Court accept his request for voluntary discipline in the form of a Review Panel Reprimand.

Based upon the record and the recommendation of the Review Panel of the State Bar Disciplinary Board, it is directed that respondent receive a Review Panel reprimand.

All the Justices concur.

In re Neal, 405 S.E.2d 875, 261 Ga. 265, 1991 Ga. LEXIS 247 (Ga. 1991).

Pincite

405 S.E.2d 875 (In re Neal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.