In re Neal

Fourth Circuit

In re Neal

339 F. App'x 357

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 5, 2009·No. No. 09-1365·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Lee Neal petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his habeas petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we deny as moot the motion to expedite and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Lee Neal petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his habeas petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we deny as moot the motion to expedite and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

In re Neal, 339 F. App'x 357 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

339 F. App'x 357 (In re Neal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.