In re N./C./S. Children

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re N./C./S. Children

302 A.D.2d 286, 753 N.Y.S.2d 840, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1555

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 20, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 302 A.D.2d 286 (In re N./C./S. Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re N./C./S. Children, 302 A.D.2d 286, 753 N.Y.S.2d 840, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1555 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Orders of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Allen Alpert, J.), entered on or about March 25, 1998, insofar as they bring up for review the fact-finding determinations that respondent father abused and neglected the subject children, unanimously affirmed, and the appeals from said orders of disposition are otherwise dismissed, all without costs.

The appeals from those portions of the orders directing placement of the subject children are moot, the terms of the directed placements having expired (see Matter of Simone M., 298 AD2d 171). With respect to the findings of abuse and neglect against respondent father brought up for review by the appeals from the dispositional orders, those findings were sufficiently supported by the children’s cross-corroborating out-of-court statements (see Matter of Nicole V., 71 NY2d 112, 123-124) and by the testimony of a police officer, caseworkers from the Administration for Children’s Services, social workers, an examining physician, and, indeed, respondents themselves. Concur — Saxe, J.P., Buckley, Rosenberger, Lerner and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Allen Alpert, J.), entered on or about March 25, 1998, insofar as they bring up for review the fact-finding determinations that respondent father abused and neglected the subject children, unanimously affirmed, and the appeals from said orders of disposition are otherwise dismissed, all without costs.

The appeals from those portions of the orders directing placement of the subject children are moot, the terms of the directed placements having expired (see Matter of Simone M., 298 AD2d 171). With respect to the findings of abuse and neglect against respondent father brought up for review by the appeals from the dispositional orders, those findings were sufficiently supported by the children’s cross-corroborating out-of-court statements (see Matter of Nicole V., 71 NY2d 112, 123-124) and by the testimony of a police officer, caseworkers from the Administration for Children’s Services, social workers, an examining physician, and, indeed, respondents themselves. Concur — Saxe, J.P., Buckley, Rosenberger, Lerner and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

302 A.D.2d 286, 753 N.Y.S.2d 840, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ncs-children-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack