in Re Navistar, Inc.
This text of in Re Navistar, Inc. (in Re Navistar, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-16-00287-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE NAVISTAR, INC.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Longoria Per Curiam Order
Relator, Navistar, Inc. (“Navistar”), filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the
above cause on May 26, 2016. Through this original proceeding, relator seeks to set
aside discovery orders which “compel Navistar to produce documents from a Securities
Exchange Commission investigation into the financial disclosures made by Navistar’s
parent company and its former CEO to stockholders about proposed engines Navistar
never manufactured for sale and which are different from the engine model” that powers
trucks purchased by the real party in interest, Americorp Xpress Carriers, LLC. The Court requests that the real party in interest, Americorp Xpress Carriers, LLC,
or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, including but
not limited to Santex Truck Centers Ltd., file a response to the petition for writ of
mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 27th day of May, 2016.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Navistar, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-navistar-inc-texapp-2016.