In re Navarro

266 A.D. 181, 41 N.Y.S.2d 585, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3516
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 21, 1943
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 266 A.D. 181 (In re Navarro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Navarro, 266 A.D. 181, 41 N.Y.S.2d 585, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3516 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think the arbitrators should have adjourned the hearings in order to afford the appellant an opportunity to secure evidence concerning the alleged excessive charges for freight. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1462, subd. 3.)

The judgment and orders should be reversed, with costs, and the matter remitted to the Special Term for further proceedings.

Untermyer, Bore and Cohn, ' JJ., concur; Martin, P. J., and Callahan, J., dissent and vote to affirm.

Judgment and orders reversed, with costs, and the matter remitted to the Special Term for further proceedings in accordance with opinion. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Arbitration between Woodco Manufacturing Corp. & G. R. & R. Manufacturing, Inc.
51 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Del Vecchio v. Del Vecchio
32 A.D.2d 1060 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 A.D. 181, 41 N.Y.S.2d 585, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-navarro-nyappdiv-1943.