Home/Court of Appeals of Texas/in Re National Unity Insurance Company and David Hadley

in Re National Unity Insurance Company and David Hadley

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 3, 2015·No. 10-15-00169-CV·Published

Opinion

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-15-00169-CV

IN RE NATIONAL UNITY INSURANCE COMPANY AND DAVID HADLEY

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

AL SCOGGINS Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins (Chief Justice Gray dissenting with a note)* Petition denied Opinion delivered and filed July 2, 2015 [OT06]

*(Chief Justice Gray dissents. A separate opinion will not issue. He notes that the purpose for the statutory notice period cannot be fulfilled if its required time period before filing suit is simply ignored and other meters and clocks run unabated. As for the EUO, what’s the point of a contractual right if it can be completely negated by prematurely filing suit.)

In re National Unity Insurance Company Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re National Unity Insurance Company and David Hadley, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

in Re National Unity Insurance Company and David Hadley (in Re National Unity Insurance Company and David Hadley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.