in Re National Unity Insurance Company and David Hadley
This text of in Re National Unity Insurance Company and David Hadley (in Re National Unity Insurance Company and David Hadley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-15-00169-CV
IN RE NATIONAL UNITY INSURANCE COMPANY AND DAVID HADLEY
Original Proceeding
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
AL SCOGGINS Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins (Chief Justice Gray dissenting with a note)* Petition denied Opinion delivered and filed July 2, 2015 [OT06] *(Chief Justice Gray dissents. A separate opinion will not issue. He notes that the purpose for the statutory notice period cannot be fulfilled if its required time period before filing suit is simply ignored and other meters and clocks run unabated. As for the EUO, what’s the point of a contractual right if it can be completely negated by prematurely filing suit.)
In re National Unity Insurance Company Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re National Unity Insurance Company and David Hadley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-national-unity-insurance-company-and-david-h-texapp-2015.