In re Nathaniel W.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Nathaniel W.

271 A.D.2d 692, 707 N.Y.S.2d 863, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4459

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 24, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 271 A.D.2d 692 (In re Nathaniel W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Nathaniel W., 271 A.D.2d 692, 707 N.Y.S.2d 863, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4459 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Segal, J.), dated September 20, 1996, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated May 28, 1996, made upon the appellant’s admission, finding that he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of possession of an imitation firearm, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him with the New York State Division for Youth for a period of 12 months.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant’s argument that the court’s finding of probable cause was erroneous was waived by his admission (see, Matter of Michael C., 215 AD2d 228). Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Segal, J.), dated September 20, 1996, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated May 28, 1996, made upon the appellant’s admission, finding that he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of possession of an imitation firearm, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him with the New York State Division for Youth for a period of 12 months.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant’s argument that the court’s finding of probable cause was erroneous was waived by his admission (see, Matter of Michael C., 215 AD2d 228). Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 692, 707 N.Y.S.2d 863, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nathaniel-w-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack