in Re Nathaniel Jones III
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _________________ NO. 09-15-00055-CV _________________
IN RE NATHANIEL JONES III
________________________________________________________________________
Original Proceeding ________________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Nathaniel Jones III complains that the trial court abused its discretion by
failing to rule on Jones’s motions in a civil suit on file before the 172nd District
Court of Jefferson County, Texas. Jones filed an original petition asserting claims
against two prison employees in their individual capacities. Jones has not shown
that he requested that citation issue, provided an address for service on either
defendant, filed a declaration of inability to pay costs with his petition, or filed a
motion to compel issuance of citation. See Johnson v. McAdams, 781 S.W.2d 451,
452 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1989, orig. proceeding) (denying mandamus
1 relief when the petition failed to show the trial court breached a duty to compel the
clerk to issue citation).
Relator’s unsupported claim that he mailed the trial court a copy of a request
for issuance of citation that Jones directed to the clerk does not establish that Jones
requested a ruling by the trial court. Jones filed a written request for a final order,
but it appears that Jones filed it with the clerk without asking that the request be
presented to the trial court and without submitting a proposed final order for the
judge’s signature. To establish abuse of discretion by failing to rule on a motion,
the relator must show that he asked the trial court to rule. See In re Querishi, No.
14-13-00300-CV, 2013 WL 1845770, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Apr.
30, 2013, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). We deny the petition for writ of
mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on March 18, 2015 Opinion Delivered March 19, 2015
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Nathaniel Jones III (in Re Nathaniel Jones III) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.