In re Natelson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Natelson

129 A. 183, 3 N.J. Misc. 549, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 179

DecidedMay 18, 1925

StatusPublished

This text of 129 A. 183 (In re Natelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Natelson, 129 A. 183, 3 N.J. Misc. 549, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 179 (N.J. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam;.

Applicant is an attorney and counselor of New York, as he claims, and lias been such for over ten years. He took the examination for attorney in this state under the provisions of rule 5 of this court, and failed to pass. He desires to apply again for a license and to take a second examination, and the question is whether he is subject to the provisions of paragraph 0 of rule 6 requiring an ad interim service of a clerkship.

The court is of opinion on an examination of the rules, relating to bar examinations, that the provisions of paragraph C of rule 6 are not intended to apply to lawyers from other states with a record therein of ten years or more of service, and, in consequence, the applicant may be re-examined after the proper interval, without service of a clerkship ad interim in this state.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam;.

Applicant is an attorney and counselor of New York, as he claims, and lias been such for over ten years. He took the examination for attorney in this state under the provisions of rule 5 of this court, and failed to pass. He desires to apply again for a license and to take a second examination, and the question is whether he is subject to the provisions of paragraph 0 of rule 6 requiring an ad interim service of a clerkship.

The court is of opinion on an examination of the rules, relating to bar examinations, that the provisions of paragraph C of rule 6 are not intended to apply to lawyers from other states with a record therein of ten years or more of service, and, in consequence, the applicant may be re-examined after the proper interval, without service of a clerkship ad interim in this state.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 A. 183, 3 N.J. Misc. 549, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-natelson-nj-1925.