In Re Natalie Hartman v. the State of Texas

Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)

In Re Natalie Hartman v. the State of Texas

CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

DecidedJune 16, 2026

Docket01-26-00584-CV

StatusPublished

This text of In Re Natalie Hartman v. the State of Texas (In Re Natalie Hartman v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Natalie Hartman v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion issued June 16, 2026

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-26-00584-CV ——————————— IN RE NATALIE HARTMAN, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Natalie Hartman filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that

our Court compel the trial court to (1) disregard opposing counsel’s vacation letter

and (2) “immediately rule on Relator’s Motion to Freeze Assets ‘on the papers’ from

home.”1 Relator further requests that our Court “freeze the Real Party in Interest’s

1 The underlying case is Natalie Hartman v. Martin Eckert, cause number 202630174, pending in the 127th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Denise Brown presiding. assets pending a final ruling.” We deny the petition. All related requests for relief

and any pending motions are denied.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Rivas-Molloy and Guiney.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI