In Re Nasri

970 A.2d 268, 2009 WL 1151289
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 30, 2009
Docket09-BG-50
StatusPublished

This text of 970 A.2d 268 (In Re Nasri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Nasri, 970 A.2d 268, 2009 WL 1151289 (D.C. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the order of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board disbarring respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, see In re Nazanin Malekalketab Nasri, VSB Docket N. 08-000-074900 (September 17, 2008), this court’s February 6, 2009, order suspending respondent from the practice of law in this jurisdiction pending further action of the court and directing her to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, respondent’s failure to respond to that order, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline; and it appearing that respondent has failed to file the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Nazanin M. Nasri, is hereby disbarred from the practice of law *269 in the District of Columbia. D.C. Bar R. XI, §§ 3(a)(1), 11(c), (e). See In re MacDonald, 950 A.2d 42, 43 n. 2 (D.C.2008). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s disbarment will not begin to run until such time as she files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re MacDonald
950 A.2d 42 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
970 A.2d 268, 2009 WL 1151289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nasri-dc-2009.