In Re Nasri

970 A.2d 268, 2009 WL 1151289
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided April 30, 2009·No. 09-BG-50·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the order of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board disbarring respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, see In re Nazanin Malekalketab Nasri, VSB Docket N. 08-000-074900 (September 17, 2008), this court’s February 6, 2009, order suspending respondent from the practice of law in this jurisdiction pending further action of the court and directing her to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, respondent’s failure to respond to that order, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline; and it appearing that respondent has failed to file the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Nazanin M. Nasri, is hereby disbarred from the practice of law *269 in the District of Columbia. D.C. Bar R. XI, §§ 3(a)(1), 11(c), (e). See In re MacDonald, 950 A.2d 42, 43 n. 2 (D.C.2008). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s disbarment will not begin to run until such time as she files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Nasri, 970 A.2d 268, 2009 WL 1151289 (D.C. 2009).

970 A.2d 268 (In Re Nasri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re MacDonald
950 A.2d 42 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2008)