In re Nash

62 Colo. 101
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedSeptember 15, 1916
DocketNo. 9049
StatusPublished

This text of 62 Colo. 101 (In re Nash) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Nash, 62 Colo. 101 (Colo. 1916).

Opinion

Mr. Justice White

delivered the opinion of the court.

The sole question involved herein is whether petitioner may be legally held in custody by the sheriff of Moffat County under and by virtue of a writ of Ne Exeat República, issued out of the District Court for that county, in an action at law there pending, to recover of petitioner herein damages for slander.

The scope of the writ of Ne Exeat has not, in this state, been enlarged by statute, — sec. 469, Code of Civil Procedure, — and if there are exceptions, as claimed, to the rule that the writ is a mesne process of equity, the underlying facts in the action for slander were insufficient to authorize the issuance of the writ. — People, ex rel v. Barton, 16 Colo. 75, 80, 26 Pac. 149, 29 Cyc. 384, 386, 387.

The petitioner is, therefore, entitled to rely upon the habeas corpus act and is accordingly discharged from custody.

Decision en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Porteus v. Barton
16 Colo. 75 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 Colo. 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nash-colo-1916.