In re Na'Quana J.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Na'Quana J.

50 A.D.3d 291, 853 N.Y.S.2d 884

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 3, 2008

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 50 A.D.3d 291 (In re Na'Quana J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Na'Quana J., 50 A.D.3d 291, 853 N.Y.S.2d 884 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Juan M. Merchan, J.), entered on or about September 11, 2007, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon her admission that she committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute theft of services, and placed her with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion in adjudicating appellant a juvenile delinquent rather than a person in need of supervision (see e.g. Matter of Rosemary R., 29 AD3d 309 [2006]; Matter of Jade Q., 41 AD3d 327 [2007]), in view of her serious drug abuse, truancy problems, gang involvement, general misbehavior and history of running away from home and from residential facilities. Concur—Lippman, EJ., Tom, Buckley and Moskowitz, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Juan M. Merchan, J.), entered on or about September 11, 2007, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon her admission that she committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute theft of services, and placed her with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion in adjudicating appellant a juvenile delinquent rather than a person in need of supervision (see e.g. Matter of Rosemary R., 29 AD3d 309 [2006]; Matter of Jade Q., 41 AD3d 327 [2007]), in view of her serious drug abuse, truancy problems, gang involvement, general misbehavior and history of running away from home and from residential facilities. Concur—Lippman, EJ., Tom, Buckley and Moskowitz, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.3d 291, 853 N.Y.S.2d 884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-naquana-j-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack