in Re: Nancy Arbuckle
This text of in Re: Nancy Arbuckle (in Re: Nancy Arbuckle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed December 5, 2003.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-03-01335-CV
IN RE NANCY ARBUCKLE, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On December 5, 2003, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In her petition, relator seeks to have this Court set aside a discovery order issued December 3, 2003, in cause number 2003-38961 in the 165th District Court of Harris County. Relator has not demonstrated that the trial court abused its discretion.
We deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed December 5, 2003.
Panel consists of Justices Anderson and Seymore. (Former Chief Justice Scott Brister not participating.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Nancy Arbuckle, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nancy-arbuckle-texapp-2003.