In re Namias

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Namias

722 A.2d 925, 157 N.J. 15, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 49

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 27, 1999·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on October 30,1998, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that S. MICHAEL NAMIAS of NORTH BRUNSWICK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1972, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate), and RPC 5.5(a) (unauthorized practice of law), and good cause appearing;

[16] It is ORDERED that S. MICHAEL NAMIAS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on October 30,1998, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that S. MICHAEL NAMIAS of NORTH BRUNSWICK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1972, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate), and RPC 5.5(a) (unauthorized practice of law), and good cause appearing;

[16] It is ORDERED that S. MICHAEL NAMIAS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

In re Namias, 722 A.2d 925, 157 N.J. 15, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 49 (N.J. 1999).

Pincite

722 A.2d 925 (In re Namias) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.