In Re Naman Howell Smith & Lee PLLC and David Ortega v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 15, 2025·No. 04-24-00849-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

04-24-00849-CV

IN RE NAMAN HOWELL SMITH & LEE PLLC and David ORTEGA Original Proceeding 1 0F

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 15, 2025 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On December 13, 2024, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus. This court has determined the relators are not entitled to the relief sought. Therefore, the petition for a writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8.

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2023-CI-09973, styled Joe A. Gamez Law Firm, P.C. and Joe A. Gamez, v. BITC National Insurance Company, BITCO General Insurance Corporation, R. Scott Westlund, Ketterman, Rowland & Westlund, Naman Howell Smith & Lee, PLLC, and David Ortega, in the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Angelica Jimenez presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Naman Howell Smith & Lee PLLC and David Ortega v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

In Re Naman Howell Smith & Lee PLLC and David Ortega v. the State of Texas (In Re Naman Howell Smith & Lee PLLC and David Ortega v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.