In Re Naman Howell Smith & Lee PLLC and David Ortega v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Naman Howell Smith & Lee PLLC and David Ortega v. the State of Texas (In Re Naman Howell Smith & Lee PLLC and David Ortega v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION
04-24-00849-CV
IN RE NAMAN HOWELL SMITH & LEE PLLC and David ORTEGA
Original Proceeding 1 0F
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice
Delivered and Filed: January 15, 2025
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On December 13, 2024, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus. This court has
determined the relators are not entitled to the relief sought. Therefore, the petition for a writ of
mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8.
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2023-CI-09973, styled Joe A. Gamez Law Firm, P.C. and Joe A. Gamez, v. BITC National Insurance Company, BITCO General Insurance Corporation, R. Scott Westlund, Ketterman, Rowland & Westlund, Naman Howell Smith & Lee, PLLC, and David Ortega, in the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Angelica Jimenez presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Naman Howell Smith & Lee PLLC and David Ortega v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-naman-howell-smith-lee-pllc-and-david-ortega-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.