In re Nalls

926 So. 2d 491, 2006 La. LEXIS 1185, 2006 WL 995736
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedApril 17, 2006
DocketNo. 2006-B-0257
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 926 So. 2d 491 (In re Nalls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Nalls, 926 So. 2d 491, 2006 La. LEXIS 1185, 2006 WL 995736 (La. 2006).

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into [492]*492allegations that respondent filed and pursued a frivolous lawsuit on behalf of a client. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent admitted that his conduct violated Rules 1.16(a)(1) (failure to decline or terminate a representation when the representation will result in a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law), 3.1 (meritorious claims and contentions), and 8.4(d) (engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Clarence T. Nalls, Jr., Louisiana Bar Roll number 1500, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day. This suspension shall be deferred in its entirety, subject to respondent’s successful completion of a two-year period of probation governed by the terms and conditions set forth in the Petition for Consent Discipline. Any failure of respondent to comply with the conditions of probation, or any misconduct during the probationary period, may be grounds for making the deferred suspension executory, or imposing additional discipline, as appropriate.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

VICTORY, TRAYLOR and KNOLL, JJ., would reject the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Nalls
145 So. 3d 1011 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
926 So. 2d 491, 2006 La. LEXIS 1185, 2006 WL 995736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nalls-la-2006.