In re: Nakayama
This text of In re: Nakayama (In re: Nakayama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 19-OCT-2022 01:29 PM Dkt. 5 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
IN RE KEVIN N. NAKAYAMA, Petitioner.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the Petitioner’s October 18, 2022
petition for a writ of mandamus, and the record in 1CPC-19-
0001582, 1CPC-XX-XXXXXXX, and 1CPC-XX-XXXXXXX, we conclude that
the Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that he has a clear and
indisputable right to relief and no other remedy, see State ex
rel. Kaneshiro v. Huddy, 82 Hawai&i 188, 193, 921 P.2d 108, 113
(1996). Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED that the petition is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 19, 2022.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd W. Eddins
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re: Nakayama, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nakayama-haw-2022.