In Re: Naheed Ghassemi Revocable Trust

• Court: District Court, District of Columbia
• Decided: January 21, 2026
• Docket: Civil Action No. 2025-1979
• Status: Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN RE: NAHEED GHASSEMI REVOCABLE TRUST

NAHEED GHASSEMI REVOCABLE TRUST,

Appellant,

v. Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-01979 (CJN)

8TH ST. VENTURE HOLDINGS, LLC, et al.,

Appellees.

ORDER

Before the Court is Appellee Y&R 2022, LLC’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction

an appeal from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Columbia. ECF No. 3 (Mot.). Y&R

argues that the Appellant, the Naheed Ghassemi Revocable Trust, failed to file its Notice of Appeal

within the fourteen-day statutory window prescribed by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure

8002. The Trust opposes the motion. ECF No. 10 (Response). Upon consideration of the papers

filed by the parties, the relevant opinions and orders of the Bankruptcy Court, and the entire record

in this case, the Court grants the motion.

The Trust’s appeal arises from an adversary proceeding concerning the priority of liens on

real property located at 1111 8th Street N.E., Washington, D.C., 20002. The Naheed Ghassemi

Revocable Trust v. 8th Street Venture Holdings, LLC, Adversary Proceeding No. 22-10005. On

May 29, 2025, the Bankruptcy Court granted summary judgment for Y&R, having determined that

the Trust’s deed of trust had been validly subordinated to Y&R’s deed of trust. ECF No. 1 at 4–

1 17 (Memorandum Opinion) and 18–19 (Order). The Trust filed a Notice of Appeal twenty-five

days later, on June 23, 2025. Y&R moved to dismiss the appeal as untimely. Mot. at 1.

District courts have jurisdiction to hear appeals from “final judgments, orders, and

decrees . . . of bankruptcy judges.” 28 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1). Such appeals must be “taken . . . in the

time provided by Rule 8002 of the Bankruptcy Rules.” 28 U.S.C. § 158(c)(2). Federal Rule of

Bankruptcy Procedure 8002(a)(1) requires that a notice of appeal be filed “within 14 days after the

judgment, order, or decree to be appealed is entered.” Rule 8002 is “strictly construed and requires

strict compliance,” Riley v. Capitol Park II Condo. Ass’n, Inc., No. 18-cv-0605, 2019 WL

1432596, at *3 (D.D.C. Mar. 29, 2019) (citation omitted), and its statutory deadline is

jurisdictional, thus “depriving reviewing courts of jurisdiction over an untimely appeal.” Id. at 5

(citation omitted).

Here, it is undisputed that the Trust filed its appeal out of time. Response at 2 (“[T]he

Trust concedes that the appeal was filed more than 14 days after the grant of summary

judgment[.]”). Because the Trust failed to file within the requisite statutory window, the Court

lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeal unless an exception applies. The Trust invokes Rule

8002(d), id. at 2–3, which allows a bankruptcy judge to extend the deadline to file a notice of

appeal, but there is no indication that the Bankruptcy Court has done so. See ECF No. 11 at 3–4.

Perhaps sensing its losing hand, the Trust contends in the alternative that its appeal is

premature because the Bankruptcy Court “did not determine how much was to be awarded to Y&R

or if any moneys remain to be distributed to the Trust,” but rather “merely determined the priority

of the liens.” Id. at 2. That argument is contradicted by the plain language of the Bankruptcy

Court’s decision, which explicitly states: “Final judgment is entered in favor of Y&R on its Motion

for Summary Judgment.” ECF 1 at 19 (emphasis deleted).

2 In other words, the Bankruptcy Court conclusively determined that Y&R holds “a first in

priority lien against the real property” at issue in the dispute, id., a decision the Trust decided to

seek relief from. But the Trust failed to timely appeal that decision, and that delay is fatal because

Rule 8002’s deadline is jurisdictional. In re Riley, 2019 WL 1432596, at *5.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Appellee Y&R 2022, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and it is

further

ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

The Clerk’s Office is directed to terminate this case.

SO ORDERED.

DATE: January 21, 2026 CARL J. NICHOLS United States District Judge