In re Nagy
This text of 124 F. App'x 192 (In re Nagy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Paul Nagy has filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to have this court direct the district court to rule in an action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). On December 9, 2004, the district court entered its order dismissing the Bivens action. Accordingly, we deny [193]*193the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
124 F. App'x 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nagy-ca4-2005.