In re Nagiel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Nagiel

255 A.D. 723, 6 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4909

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 12, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D. 723 (In re Nagiel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Nagiel, 255 A.D. 723, 6 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Orders reversed on the law, without costs, and motions denied, without costs. Section 135 of the Election Law requires that designating petitions for party nominations or election to party position at a primary election shall be numbered consecutively, beginning with number one, at the foot of each page. Such requirement is directory, not mandatory. There was no claim of actual fraud. Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes to affirm, being of the opinion that the provision of section 135 of the Election Law under consideration is mandatory. Its evident purpose is to safeguard against fraud. A failure to comply makes the petition invalid without proof of fraud in fact.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders reversed on the law, without costs, and motions denied, without costs. Section 135 of the Election Law requires that designating petitions for party nominations or election to party position at a primary election shall be numbered consecutively, beginning with number one, at the foot of each page. Such requirement is directory, not mandatory. There was no claim of actual fraud. Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes to affirm, being of the opinion that the provision of section 135 of the Election Law under consideration is mandatory. Its evident purpose is to safeguard against fraud. A failure to comply makes the petition invalid without proof of fraud in fact.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D. 723, 6 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nagiel-nyappdiv-1938.