In re Nagel

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Nagel

761 A.2d 534, 165 N.J. 565, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 1713

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedNovember 22, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 761 A.2d 534 (In re Nagel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Nagel, 761 A.2d 534, 165 N.J. 565, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 1713 (N.J. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision concluding that BRUCE H. NAGEL of LIVINGSTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1977, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 3.4(c)(knowingly disobeying an obligation under the rules of tribunal) and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that BRUCE H. NAGEL is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI