In Re Nagel
This text of 12 A.3d 1169 (In Re Nagel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
On consideration of the certified order of the Supreme Court of Illinois suspending respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction for a period of one year, stayed pending completion of a two year probationary period, see In re Nagel, Supreme Court No. M.R.23075, Commission no. 08 CF 42 (Ill., May 19, 2009), this court’s December 6, 2010, directing her to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, no response having been filed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, it is
*1170 ORDERED that, Doris K Nagel, Esquire, is hereby suspended for a period of one year with a fitness requirement; however, that suspension is hereby stayed pending respondent’s successful completion of the probationary period imposed by Illinois. See In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007) and In re Willingham, 900 A.2d 165 (D.C.2006) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 A.3d 1169, 2011 D.C. App. LEXIS 29, 2011 WL 445856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nagel-dc-2011.