In re Naeemah M.
This text of 42 A.D.3d 501 (In re Naeemah M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother, Antoinette E, and Clifford E, a person legally responsible for the care of the subject child, separately appeal from a fact-finding order of the Family Court, Kings County (Elkins, J), dated April 28, 2006, which, after a hearing, found that they abused the subject child.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Family Court’s finding that the subject child is an abused child is supported by a preponderance of the evidence at the hearing (see Family Court Act § 1012 [e] [i]; § 1046 [a] [vi]; [b] [i]; Matter of Maithsa Edourd S., 27 AD3d 475 [2006]; Matter of Eli G., 189 AD2d 764, 764-765 [1993]; Matter of C. Children, 183 AD2d 767 [1992]).
The mother’s remaining contention is without merit. Rivera, J.E, Krausman, Skelos and Balkin, JJ, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 A.D.3d 501, 838 N.Y.S.2d 790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-naeemah-m-nyappdiv-2007.