In re Nabut
275 A.D.2d 1051
Opinion
[1052] It is our opinion that this record does not present a proper case for such summary action against an attorney (Matter of Bailey v. Rutherford, 242 N. Y. 220, 223); and, furthermore, the judgment of a competent court, after trial of the issues between the parties, may not be thus collaterally impeached. (Trupin v. D. M. W. Contr. Co., 259 App. Div. 529, 532.) Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur. [See 276 App. Div. 783.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Nabut, 275 A.D.2d 1051 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).
275 A.D.2d 1051 (In re Nabut) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Bailey v. Rutherford
151 N.E. 213 (New York Court of Appeals, 1926)
Trupin v. D. M. W. Contracting Co.
259 A.D. 529 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)