In re Nabut

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Nabut

275 A.D.2d 1051

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 17, 1949

StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 1051 (In re Nabut) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Nabut, 275 A.D.2d 1051 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

[1052]*1052It is our opinion that this record does not present a proper case for such summary action against an attorney (Matter of Bailey v. Rutherford, 242 N. Y. 220, 223); and, furthermore, the judgment of a competent court, after trial of the issues between the parties, may not be thus collaterally impeached. (Trupin v. D. M. W. Contr. Co., 259 App. Div. 529, 532.) Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur. [See 276 App. Div. 783.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1052]*1052It is our opinion that this record does not present a proper case for such summary action against an attorney (Matter of Bailey v. Rutherford, 242 N. Y. 220, 223); and, furthermore, the judgment of a competent court, after trial of the issues between the parties, may not be thus collaterally impeached. (Trupin v. D. M. W. Contr. Co., 259 App. Div. 529, 532.) Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur. [See 276 App. Div. 783.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 1051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nabut-nyappdiv-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack