In re Nabonne

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Nabonne

598 So. 2d 338, 1992 WL 113200

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 27, 1992

DocketNo. 92-B-0626

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 598 So. 2d 338 (In re Nabonne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Nabonne, 598 So. 2d 338, 1992 WL 113200 (La. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the Disciplinary Board’s findings of fact, its application of the Rules of Professional Conduct to those facts, its recommended discipline, and Disciplinary Counsel’s objection to the Disciplinary Board ruling. Upon review of the record filed herein, the objection and brief filed by Disciplinary Counsel, and oral argument, it is the decision of this Court to adopt the recommended discipline of a sixty (60) day suspension, except, for clarity and certainty of term, the suspension be effec-[339]*339tivé from the date of finality of this judgment.

DECREE

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT RONALD P. NABONNE BE SUSPENDED FROM THE PRACTICE OF LAW FOR A PERIOD OF SIXTY DAYS FROM THE FINALITY OF THIS JUDGMENT.

ALL COSTS OF THIS PROCEEDING ARE ASSESSED TO THE RESPONDENT. SIXTY DAY SUSPENSION ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the Disciplinary Board’s findings of fact, its application of the Rules of Professional Conduct to those facts, its recommended discipline, and Disciplinary Counsel’s objection to the Disciplinary Board ruling. Upon review of the record filed herein, the objection and brief filed by Disciplinary Counsel, and oral argument, it is the decision of this Court to adopt the recommended discipline of a sixty (60) day suspension, except, for clarity and certainty of term, the suspension be effec-[339]*339tivé from the date of finality of this judgment.

DECREE

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT RONALD P. NABONNE BE SUSPENDED FROM THE PRACTICE OF LAW FOR A PERIOD OF SIXTY DAYS FROM THE FINALITY OF THIS JUDGMENT.

ALL COSTS OF THIS PROCEEDING ARE ASSESSED TO THE RESPONDENT. SIXTY DAY SUSPENSION ORDERED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

598 So. 2d 338, 1992 WL 113200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nabonne-la-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack