In re Nabonne

598 So. 2d 338, 1992 WL 113200
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 27, 1992·No. No. 92-B-0626·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the Disciplinary Board’s findings of fact, its application of the Rules of Professional Conduct to those facts, its recommended discipline, and Disciplinary Counsel’s objection to the Disciplinary Board ruling. Upon review of the record filed herein, the objection and brief filed by Disciplinary Counsel, and oral argument, it is the decision of this Court to adopt the recommended discipline of a sixty (60) day suspension, except, for clarity and certainty of term, the suspension be effec-[339]*339tivé from the date of finality of this judgment.

DECREE

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT RONALD P. NABONNE BE SUSPENDED FROM THE PRACTICE OF LAW FOR A PERIOD OF SIXTY DAYS FROM THE FINALITY OF THIS JUDGMENT.

ALL COSTS OF THIS PROCEEDING ARE ASSESSED TO THE RESPONDENT. SIXTY DAY SUSPENSION ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Nabonne, 598 So. 2d 338, 1992 WL 113200 (La. 1992).

598 So. 2d 338 (In re Nabonne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Lucas
598 So. 2d 338 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1992)