In re Na-Kyung Kang

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Na-Kyung Kang

58 A.3d 729, 212 N.J. 559, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 83

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 24, 2013·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12-189, concluding that NA-KYUNG KANG of [560] FORT LEE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2008, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.5(b)(failure to communicate basis or rate of fee in writing), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that NA-KYUNG KANG is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12-189, concluding that NA-KYUNG KANG of [560] FORT LEE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2008, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.5(b)(failure to communicate basis or rate of fee in writing), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that NA-KYUNG KANG is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

In re Na-Kyung Kang, 58 A.3d 729, 212 N.J. 559, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 83 (N.J. 2013).

Pincite

58 A.3d 729 (In re Na-Kyung Kang) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.