In re N. Shaffer & Son

M.D. Pennsylvania

In re N. Shaffer & Son

128 F. 986, 1904 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 382

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 4, 1904

DocketNo. 416

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 128 F. 986 (In re N. Shaffer & Son) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re N. Shaffer & Son, 128 F. 986, 1904 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 382 (M.D. Pa. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

[987]*987The court

(ARCHBADD, District Judge)

made ‘ the following order:

Now, 4th day of March, 1904, the receiver in bankruptcy, Moses Salsburg, is directed to .set aside the property described in the petition, viz., one bay horse, one covered delivery wagon, and one set of single harness, in order that the same may be delivered over to the trustee to await the action of court as to the right of petitioner, Nathan Shaffer, to the same as a part of his exemption; and in case the petitioner, Nathan Shaffer, shall furnish security in the sum of $200, double its appraised value, conditioned for the return of said property to the trustee in the event his right to exempt the same shall not be sustained, then the receiver is directed to turn the same over to the petitioner, Nathan Shaffer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[987]*987The court

(ARCHBADD, District Judge)

made ‘ the following order:

Now, 4th day of March, 1904, the receiver in bankruptcy, Moses Salsburg, is directed to .set aside the property described in the petition, viz., one bay horse, one covered delivery wagon, and one set of single harness, in order that the same may be delivered over to the trustee to await the action of court as to the right of petitioner, Nathan Shaffer, to the same as a part of his exemption; and in case the petitioner, Nathan Shaffer, shall furnish security in the sum of $200, double its appraised value, conditioned for the return of said property to the trustee in the event his right to exempt the same shall not be sustained, then the receiver is directed to turn the same over to the petitioner, Nathan Shaffer.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 F. 986, 1904 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-n-shaffer-son-pamd-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack