In re N. Dain's Sons' Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re N. Dain's Sons' Co.

146 A.D. 918, 131 N.Y.S. 1130

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1911·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The disposition of this appeal is controlled by the rule stated in Matter of Schlotterer (105 App. Div. 115), which, holds that sections 870 et seq. of the Code of Civil Procedure do not authorize the examination of a proposed party to an action not yet begun, except for the sole purpose of perpetuating the testimony of such proposed party. The application under review is made upon the ground that the plaintiff cannot safely frame his complaint without such examination. Order [919] reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with costs. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The disposition of this appeal is controlled by the rule stated in Matter of Schlotterer (105 App. Div. 115), which, holds that sections 870 et seq. of the Code of Civil Procedure do not authorize the examination of a proposed party to an action not yet begun, except for the sole purpose of perpetuating the testimony of such proposed party. The application under review is made upon the ground that the plaintiff cannot safely frame his complaint without such examination. Order [919] reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with costs. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred.

In re N. Dain's Sons' Co., 146 A.D. 918, 131 N.Y.S. 1130 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

146 A.D. 918 (In re N. Dain's Sons' Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related