in Re Myram Jamilah
This text of in Re Myram Jamilah (in Re Myram Jamilah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed February 9, 2006.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-06-00048-CV
IN RE MARYAM JAMILAH, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On January 18, 2006, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2005); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In her petition, relator sought to have this court compel the Honorable James Blackstock, presiding judge of County Court Number 3 in Brazoria County, to reconsider his ruling sustaining a contest to her affidavit of indigence filed in connection with her appeal pending in this court under our number 14-06-00013-CV, styled Maryam Jamilah v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A.
Relator has a remedy to challenge the ruling as part of her appeal instead of by mandamus review. See In re Arroyo, 988 S.W.2d 737, 738-39 (Tex. 1998). Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus and will review the court=s ruling as part of her appeal.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed February 9, 2006.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Yates and Anderson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Myram Jamilah, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-myram-jamilah-texapp-2006.