In re Myers

515 S.E.2d 534, 335 S.C. 57, 1999 S.C. LEXIS 84
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedApril 22, 1999
StatusPublished

This text of 515 S.E.2d 534 (In re Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Myers, 515 S.E.2d 534, 335 S.C. 57, 1999 S.C. LEXIS 84 (S.C. 1999).

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition asking this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(b), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, and seeking the appointment of an attorney pursuant to Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this State is suspended until further order of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Bert Glenn Utsey, III, Esquire, is hereby appointed to assume responsibility for [58]*58respondent’s client files, trust account(s), escrow aceount(s), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain. Mr. Utsey shall take action as required by Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, to protect the interests of respondent’s clients. Mr. Utsey may make disbursements from respondent’s trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain that are necessary to effectuate this appointment.

This Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining trust, escrow and/or operating accounts) of respondent, shall serve as an injunction to prevent respondent from making withdrawals from the accounts) and shall further serve as notice to the bank or other financial institution that Bert Glenn Utsey, III, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court.

This order, when served on any office of the United States Postal Service shall serve as notice that Bert Glenn Utsey, III, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court and has the authority to receive respondent’s mail and the authority to direct that respondent’s mail be delivered to Mr. Utsey’s office.

/s/ Ernest A. Finney, Jr., C.J.

FOR THE COURT

TOAL, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
515 S.E.2d 534, 335 S.C. 57, 1999 S.C. LEXIS 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-myers-sc-1999.