In re Myers
This text of 299 F. 1020 (In re Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a Patent Office decision denying certain claims for a patent relating to a process of making brick ice cream, composed of a plurality of layers of differently flavored material. A mold is ihoved beneath three containers in succession, thus receiving a layer of ice cream from each container, each layer being formed on top of the previously formed layer.
The Assistant Commissioner, reversing the lower tribunals and resolving a doubt he entertained in favor of the applicant, allowed three claims limited to the particular process employed, saying:
“The process is simple, it is true; but it is efficient in making the particular confection, and it is believed these claims should be allowed.”
For the reasons fully set forth in the opinions of the three tribunals, we concur in the finding that the other more broadly drawn claims read on the prior art.
The decision is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
299 F. 1020, 55 App. D.C. 50, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 3495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-myers-cadc-1924.