Home/Ohio Supreme Court/In re M.W.

In re M.W.

946 N.E.2d 239, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1481
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 4, 2011
Docket2011-0215
StatusPublished

This text of 946 N.E.2d 239 (In re M.W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re M.W., 946 N.E.2d 239, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1481 (Ohio 2011).

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 94737, 2010-Ohio-6362. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

Lundberg Stratton, Lanzinger, and McGee Brown, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. Pfeifer, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
946 N.E.2d 239, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mw-ohio-2011.