Home/Ohio Supreme Court/In re M.W.

In re M.W.

946 N.E.2d 239, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1481
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re M.W.. Read the opinion of the Court — 133 Ohio St. 3d 309 →
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 4, 2011·No. 2011-0215·Published

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 94737, 2010-Ohio-6362. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

Lundberg Stratton, Lanzinger, and McGee Brown, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. Pfeifer, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re M.W., 946 N.E.2d 239, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1481 (Ohio 2011).

946 N.E.2d 239 (In re M.W.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.