In Re Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District

23 N.E.2d 946, 136 Ohio St. 92, 136 Ohio St. (N.S.) 92, 16 Ohio Op. 70, 1939 Ohio LEXIS 248
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 11, 1939
Docket27695
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 N.E.2d 946 (In Re Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District, 23 N.E.2d 946, 136 Ohio St. 92, 136 Ohio St. (N.S.) 92, 16 Ohio Op. 70, 1939 Ohio LEXIS 248 (Ohio 1939).

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Appeal dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur. Zimmerman, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

J. J. Newberry Co. v. Marshall
125 F.2d 973 (Sixth Circuit, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 N.E.2d 946, 136 Ohio St. 92, 136 Ohio St. (N.S.) 92, 16 Ohio Op. 70, 1939 Ohio LEXIS 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-muskingum-watershed-conservancy-district-ohio-1939.