In Re: Murray v.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 23, 1999·No. 98-2591·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2591

IN THE MATTER OF TYRONE E. MURRAY, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-98- 2956-L)

Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 23, 1999

Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone E. Murray, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Emanuel Murphy, Sr., appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to compel and his motion for reconsideration of

the same. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See In Re: Murray, No. CA-98-

2956-L (D. Md. Sept. 8; Oct. 8, 1998).* We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The underlying order from which Murray appeals was filed on September 4, 1998, and entered on the district court’s docket sheet on September 8, 1998. In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and 79(a), September 8, 1998, is therefore the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re: Murray v., (4th Cir. 1999).

In Re: Murray v. (In Re: Murray v.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related