In re Murray

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Murray

113 A.3d 267, 221 N.J. 299, 2015 N.J. LEXIS 506

DecidedMay 6, 2015

StatusPublished

This text of 113 A.3d 267 (In re Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Murray, 113 A.3d 267, 221 N.J. 299, 2015 N.J. LEXIS 506 (N.J. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

CORRECTED ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 14-221, concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to Rule 1:20-14, JOHN M. MURRAY of MELBOURNE BEACH, FLORIDA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1994, should be reprimanded based on discipline imposed in the state of Delaware that in New Jersey constitutes violations of RPC 3.2 (engaging in conduct intended to disrupt a tribunal and engaging in undignified and discourteous conduct that is degrading to a tribunal), RPC 6.2 (seeking to avoid appointment by a court without good cause), and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOHN M. MURRAY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CORRECTED ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 14-221, concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to Rule 1:20-14, JOHN M. MURRAY of MELBOURNE BEACH, FLORIDA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1994, should be reprimanded based on discipline imposed in the state of Delaware that in New Jersey constitutes violations of RPC 3.2 (engaging in conduct intended to disrupt a tribunal and engaging in undignified and discourteous conduct that is degrading to a tribunal), RPC 6.2 (seeking to avoid appointment by a court without good cause), and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOHN M. MURRAY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 A.3d 267, 221 N.J. 299, 2015 N.J. LEXIS 506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-murray-nj-2015.