Home/Customs and Patent Appeals/In re Murray

In re Murray

64 F.2d 788, 20 C.C.P.A. 1046, 1933 CCPA LEXIS 72
CourtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals
DecidedMay 1, 1933
DocketNo. 3086
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 64 F.2d 788 (In re Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Customs and Patent Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Murray, 64 F.2d 788, 20 C.C.P.A. 1046, 1933 CCPA LEXIS 72 (ccpa 1933).

Opinion

Graham, Presiding Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

On January 12, 1926, a patent, No. 1569332, on improvements in the manufacture of housings, was granted to appellant by the United States Patent Office. The housings in question were such as are commonly used for the gearing and rear axles of automobiles, with tubular extensions on opposite sides to house the wheel driving shafts. Certain drawings delineating appellant’s invention, known as Figures 1, 2, and 3, were a part of the original application and patent, and were the only drawings attached thereto. They are as follows:

[1047]*1047 82L2rjOfKFeXSMcuAjDLkan2fBoDFJ97z3vP3/o9K/PG0wcdlrQ6cLQLIx//tK9bkw1RdGpBnRtQMg2Qg8D/xFaDrkG0CRydlv9RyLg06AAPlfzr7FKC8dvPgXdMjbWpJ28AWculhnDGvvvXiTfrBklWpfq5KKZ9L5VIjSsH6oQDprP/Q9tRPZyMssqaUwmry8KG/XpMGcLvvoXV+a9OTTSm9Kh8aN9eht1GbzIbnH/lSSvnma6N0xyi99lLGt1/A3u5KKd+QUt575ovX2ZfyteBblT7eteOrjmH3Xvi/pP2Zv3Oe/VPHKAnQufWzAHzojVVhZpsrr1cgo/6I/YN/9PyrgQxWlvrer8o3puV+WghU+uGZUAD8DZZ49QX5ltM9l3JzGofiXGqCpetrUsqtkbl+TTSltIpmAjzbe6EhkyG26lNSfv/lt16VUrqbb7XFJoPSUDkx/vq7bw175Fe+5qsX28DC8snf/NNXsNkSbAr4C6wQbbSdHTr+ppTyhZeklPIPnu+90Pmbwy4zqiP+ppTTW017uaR0p5rmymL71RZw59lEYKBOr00zZzSGuRihpKGOK9+Fm0kuBeO5JL9yFSxSmCi4u1fBIoW5qEtqQWguMEHp6i0+S4jK2UNPcnhk5ZWDdA8yF5TSKNHHXTbmMZeumsAk5oJSuuuf0ASuHo+qdxnMBaU5FJVj1fuKWBTgUYsrg3kouLk7w2ICc0Fp/oTA+Ekf4go4jCPd6pXOHDS5+R8OiCsmMIl5zKWrJjCJR9W7DFRxxQQmMYe5NBfbLMfq0vxlkyqumADMoyYw5tBjHuXSs7kvXhXmouDSmEchcGU8cjGPlMQVE5jEXORSWg7NRfXWkpwGqrgiGvlQratmMIG5qEtjU173rohGPtQ5qN3zqJyk8YhSGTyilA2RCs0FpTTmgpJIheaCUhrzSMm6agYTUO2rZjCBuSg4kQrNY8FdNQGYSyGQVpDmglIac9HixgzP5sFxlkiF5rHg8g5muTrMRV1KQ529z

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Application of George J. Handel, Jr
312 F.2d 943 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1963)
Matter of the Application of Anna Rosalie Nelson Byers, of the Estate of Laud S. Byers, Deceased
230 F.2d 451 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 F.2d 788, 20 C.C.P.A. 1046, 1933 CCPA LEXIS 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-murray-ccpa-1933.