In re Murray

D.C. Circuit

In re Murray

269 F. 1020, 50 App. D.C. 401, 1920 U.S. App. LEXIS 1933

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided December 6, 1920·No. No. 1332·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, denying him a patent for certain improvements in the construction of rubber tires. We agree with the unanimous opinions of the tribunals below in holding that nothing patentable is disclosed over the prior art. The decision of the Commissioner of Patents is affirmed, and the clerk is directed to certify these proceedings as by law required. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, denying him a patent for certain improvements in the construction of rubber tires. We agree with the unanimous opinions of the tribunals below in holding that nothing patentable is disclosed over the prior art. The decision of the Commissioner of Patents is affirmed, and the clerk is directed to certify these proceedings as by law required. Affirmed.

In re Murray, 269 F. 1020, 50 App. D.C. 401, 1920 U.S. App. LEXIS 1933 (D.C. Cir. 1920).

Pincite

269 F. 1020 (In re Murray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.