In re Murphy

63 A.3d 574, 2013 WL 1233739

• Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
• Decided: March 28, 2013
• Docket: No. 12-BG-1944
• Status: Published

Opinion

ORDER

On consideration of the certified order suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Massachusetts for a period of one year and one day, this court’s December 20; 2012, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why the reciprocal discipline of a one year and one day suspension with a fitness requirement should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Michael A. Murphy is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of one year and one day with reinstatement contingent upon a showing of fitness. See, In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).