In Re Murphy

197 P. 59, 185 Cal. 298, 1921 Cal. LEXIS 545
California Supreme Court·Decided March 14, 1921·No. Crim. No. 2359.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The applicant on conviction of a felony was adjudged to suffer imprisonment in the state prison. He has appealed from the judgment to the district court of appeal of the first appellate district, the only court having jurisdiction of the subject matter of such an appeal. [1] Under such circumstances the only officers authorized by our law to give a certificate of probable cause are the judge of the trial court or some justice of said district court of appeal. (See In re Mayen (onhabeas corpus), (Cal.App.), 193 P. 813.)

The application is denied.

All the Justices concurred.

*Page 299

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Murphy, 197 P. 59, 185 Cal. 298, 1921 Cal. LEXIS 545 (Cal. 1921).

197 P. 59 (In Re Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hall
251 P.2d 979 (California Court of Appeal, 1952)
In Re Albori
272 P. 321 (California Court of Appeal, 1928)
Olivieri v. Police Court of Bakersfield
216 P. 44 (California Court of Appeal, 1923)