In re Murphy

California Supreme Court

In re Murphy

185 Cal. 298

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 14, 1921

DocketCrim. No. 2359

StatusPublished

This text of 185 Cal. 298 (In re Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Murphy, 185 Cal. 298 (Cal. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

The applicant on conviction of a felony was adjudged to suffer imprisonment in the state prison. He has appealed from the judgment to the district court of appeal of the first appellate district, the only court having jurisdiction of the subject matter of such an appeal. [1] Under such circumstances the only officers authorized by our law to give a certificate of probable cause are the judge of the trial court or some justice of said district court of appeal. (See In re Mayen (on habeas corpus), (Cal. App.), 193 Pac. 813.)

The application is denied.

All the. Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

The applicant on conviction of a felony was adjudged to suffer imprisonment in the state prison. He has appealed from the judgment to the district court of appeal of the first appellate district, the only court having jurisdiction of the subject matter of such an appeal. [1] Under such circumstances the only officers authorized by our law to give a certificate of probable cause are the judge of the trial court or some justice of said district court of appeal. (See In re Mayen (on habeas corpus), (Cal. App.), 193 Pac. 813.)

The application is denied.

All the. Justices concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 Cal. 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-murphy-cal-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack