In Re Murphy

California Supreme Court

In Re Murphy

100 P. 1134, 155 Cal. 322, 1909 Cal. LEXIS 431

California Supreme Court·Decided March 11, 1909·No. Crim. No. 1484.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The facts in this case are fully stated in an opinion of the district court of appeal for the second appellate district, filed in denying petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus. (See 8 Cal.App. 440, [97 P. 199].) Our investigations have satisfied us that such opinion correctly states the law applicable on the various claims made by petitioner against the validity of the municipal ordinance for a violation of which he is being prosecuted, and it is unnecessary for us to add thereto in disposing of this proceeding.

The writ of habeas corpus heretofore issued is discharged, and the petitioner remanded to the custody of the city marshal of South Pasadena. *Page 323

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The facts in this case are fully stated in an opinion of the district court of appeal for the second appellate district, filed in denying petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus. (See 8 Cal.App. 440, [97 P. 199].) Our investigations have satisfied us that such opinion correctly states the law applicable on the various claims made by petitioner against the validity of the municipal ordinance for a violation of which he is being prosecuted, and it is unnecessary for us to add thereto in disposing of this proceeding.

The writ of habeas corpus heretofore issued is discharged, and the petitioner remanded to the custody of the city marshal of South Pasadena. *Page 323

In Re Murphy, 100 P. 1134, 155 Cal. 322, 1909 Cal. LEXIS 431 (Cal. 1909).

Pincite

100 P. 1134 (In Re Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related